November 2004: Dems permit Bush to take credit for the worst military failure in U.S. history - which resulted in the deaths of thousands of U.S. civilians - and so Bush Wins! Is this the worst political stand-down in U.S. history? (more)
We Constitution-huggers here at 911blimp.net want all the awful truths about 9/11 to become fully and widely known, and we welcome all those who feel the same way: the U.S. government's bogus explanation for what occurred on 9/11 has become The Mother Of All Lies.
Where our blimp says "Bush Knew", please do not mistake this as an attempt to be politically divisive. Both [sic] sides have sold us out.The true masterminds behind 9/11 (definitely not Bush!) are very accomplished at conquering us by dividing We The People with all sorts of titillating emotional diversions and distractions (live televised mass murder, bogus politics, manufactured fear, sexual prisoner torture images, a faked "confession" video, even a phony beheading video).
"Bush Knew" is a catch-phrase for pointing out how bogus the U.S. government's explanation for what it did and did not do really is. We do not consider it an attack on Mr. Bush, just the obvious response to Mr. Bush's own admissions, in which he has repeatedly implicated himself as having somehow been "in the loop" on the very beginning of the supposedly-secret attacks: Mr. Bush said he watched a plane fly into the 1st WTC tower, on TV, before (9 a.m. when) he entered that Florida classrooom, which is more than 15 hours before the only known video of the first impact was ever broadcast on TV.
The fact that Mr. Bush has never been called upon to account for what was revealed in his 9/11 witness statements - what Bush knew, when he knew it, and how he knew it - is how we know that neither the news media (or is that now more properly known as the news medium?) nor our political system (with its fake-opposition party) nor the U.S. Congress remain functional in any Constitutional sense. Even now, people are still arguing about what "warnings" Bush had, as if he wasn't in on the attacks!
We don't know if then-majority-leader then-Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) really wanted to investigate 9/11 or not;all we do know for sure is that after Bush and Cheney asked Daschle to not investigate 9/11, the U.S. Senate did not investigate 9/11. Neither has the U.S. House of Representatives investigated 9/11. There have been some investigations around the edges - "intelligence failures (sic) leading up to 9/11", etc - but no official forensic analysis of the actual events of 9/11 itself. In fact, large amounts of government resources have been used to ensure that even investigations typical (and required!) of much less consequential catastrophes did not take place after 9/11. You can decide for yourself what it means that the so-called "911 truth movement" does not pay much attention to these missing institutional responses.
This web site contains 9/11 evidence and facts that are irrefutable, and which refute the hijacker-blaming Official Government Conspiracy Theory of 9/11. Please just look at them, and fact-check them, and then try to reconcile them with "what everybody knows" about 9/11. If you can find something wrong with the facts and evidence on this web site, please tell us. If you can't, please tell everybody else! (And also privately acknowledge to yourself that we all have been told -- and believed -- multiple lies regarding 9/11.) For the most part, the 911 'truth' 'movement', same as the government and the media, ignores and shuns these legitimate pieces of hijacker-exculpatory (and thus government conspiracy theory busting) 9/11 evidence.
That phony political opposition not only divides (& conquers) We The People, it diverts our attention from, and provides cover for, the ongoing covert domestic subversion of the Constitution - of which 9/11 and its liberty-diminishing repercussions have been integral - taking place right before our eyes. But Our Constitution is the only thing that protects us and our children from tyranny and even slavery, so to see it lost on our watch is not something to be proud of.
We can no longer be certain what (or who) our [mis]leaders are loyal to. But it certainly appears that they've sold us (and Our Constitution) out over manufactured fear of a grossly over-hyped, if not entirely virtual, enemy.
So now it's fallen (or risen, depending upon one's point of view) to We The People to stop blindly believing that people within both [sic] political parties have remained loyal to the Constitution just because they'd recited an oath of office to do so. (By 2008, nearly everyone has recognized that the USA is rampaging off and spiraling downward in bogus directions. But the [sic] 2 parties still try to get Us to believe that the problem does not stem from electing generation after generation of Republicans and Democrats, and that the solution is to merely elect different ones occasionally...)